Kenya’s top court ruled Thursday that a controversial bid by President Uhuru Kenyatta to change the constitution was illegal, dealing a blow to him and his allies ahead of key elections in August.
But it left open the possibility for the reforms — popularly known as the Building Bridges Initiative (BBI) — to be submitted again by parliament or through other means, so long as the president did not have a hand in the changes.
“The president cannot initiate constitutional amendments or changes through popular initiative under article 257 of the constitution,” said six of the seven judges overseeing the case at the Supreme Court.
The reforms would have expanded the executive and increase the number of parliamentary seats in the biggest change to Kenya’s political system since the introduction of a new constitution in 2010.
The initiative has left the East African nation’s political elite divided.
Kenyatta had argued that the change would make politics more inclusive and help end repeated cycles of election violence.
Thursday’s decision came after the High Court and Court of Appeal ruled against the proposed amendments last year.
The appeals court even said Kenyatta could be sued in a civil court for launching the process.
But the Supreme Court ruled unanimously against this idea.
“Civil proceedings cannot be instituted in any court against the president or the person performing the functions of the office of the president during their tenure of office in respect of anything done or not done under the constitution,” it declared.
BBI’s detractors — including Kenyatta’s estranged deputy William Ruto — say it is a little more than a naked grab for power by a two-term president who cannot run a third time.
The timing of the reforms spurred speculation in recent years that Kenyatta was seeking to remain in power by establishing the post of prime minister as part of the BBI.
A dream deferred’
Ruto, 54, was initially anointed by Kenyatta as his successor, but found himself marginalised after a shock 2018 pact between the president and his former foe Raila Odinga, who have a long history of opposing each other at the ballot box.
The pair’s spirited pursuit of the BBI since 2018 sparked speculation that Kenyatta may assume the new position of prime minister in a power-sharing arrangement if Odinga, 77, wins the presidency.
Earlier this month, Kenyatta, 60, endorsed Odinga, who will compete with Ruto for the country’s top job.
Thursday’s session lasted over six hours, with each of the judges including Kenya’s first female chief justice, Martha Koome, reading out their respective decisions on the case.
Analysts say the decision will jolt political alignments among smaller parties, which are weighing their options ahead of presidential and parliamentary elections barely four months away.
Already, fresh alliances are being forged, with a view to dividing the spoils come election time.
Prior to the ruling, constitutional lawyer Charles Kanjama told AFP that a verdict which “rejects the proposals in part or in whole… will give further political capital to those who opposed the process.”
Although the ruling is likely to weaken the president’s hand ahead of the August polls, Kenyatta has previously vowed to see the constitutional changes instituted in his lifetime.
“Although it encountered some legal obstacles, I can only say that BBI is just a dream deferred,” Kenyatta said last December.
“One day, someday, it will happen, because the country cannot survive ethnic majoritarianism and exclusion, just as it cannot survive unfair and skewed representation. This is a design defect that we must fix,” he said.