×

Nnamdi Kanu Vs FG: Court Warns Parties Against Truncating Proceedings In Suit Against DSS

The court had, on Feb. 1, granted Kanu, the permission to apply for an order of mandamus he sought after an ex-parte motion moved by Ozekhome to the effect.


A file photo of Nnamdi Kanu.

 

Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has warned lawyers to the Department of State Services and the Leader of the proscribed Indigenous People of Biafra, Nnamdi Kanu, against truncating proceedings in the next adjourned date.

Justice Nyako gave the warning following the day’s proceeding that could not go on due to an oral application by Counsel to the DSS Idowu Awo, seeking more time to respond to a further affidavit served on him by Kanu’s lawyer, Mike Ozekhome, in the open court.

READ ALSO: ‘You Are Very Dependable’, Tinubu Hails Wike For ‘Championing Justice’

Nnamdi Kanu, through his lawyers, had sued the DSS and its Director General praying the court for permission to apply for an order of mandamus compelling the DSS to allow him have unhindered access to his medical doctor, among others.

The court had, on Feb. 1, granted Kanu, the permission to apply for an order of mandamus he sought after an ex-parte motion moved by Ozekhome to the effect.

But in a preliminary objection filed by the DSS, the security outfit urged the court to dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction.

It argued that there was a subsisting judgement of a sister court delivered by Justice Taiwo Taiwo on June 3, 2022, in a suit between Kanu and the DG of DSS and two others wherein the court dealt substantially with the issue of allowing the IPOB leader access to his personal physician.

It said the instant suit was similar to the earlier one and that Kanu had filed an appeal against the judgment.

At the resumed hearing,  Ozekhome informed the court that he had responded to the DSS notice of preliminary objection.

After Awo applied for an order for the extension of time to file their processes, Ozekhome also prayed for a consequential order deeming their further affidavit as duly filed and they were granted by the court.

But Awo, who said he was just being served with the further affidavit, said he would need more time to study the document whether fresh facts had been raised.

He said the document was 60 paragraphs but embedded in 15 paragraphs.

Ozekhome, however, said that in the counter affidavit filed by the security agency, they alleged that Kanu jumped bail.

The senior lawyer said they were forced to serve the further affidavit on Tuesday because the DSS served them on Friday.

He said the security outfit was in the habit of serving them with their processes late to delay the hearing.

Delivering a short ruling for an adjournment, Justice Nyako, said she would not tolerate any act that might delay proceedings any longer and there must be an end to exchange processes.

The judge adjourned the matter until May 22 for a hearing.