Alleged Illegal Arms Possession: Melaye, Others Plead ‘Not Guilty’

Salami Segun  
Updated June 11, 2018
Suspects Who Indicted Melaye Say Allegations Are False
Fine photo: Senator Dino Melaye


The trial of the lawmaker representing Kogi West in the National Assembly, Senator Dino Melaye, and two others in the case of alleged illegal possession of firearms began today in Lokoja, the Kogi State capital. 

The two prime suspects, Kabiru Seidu and Nuhu Salihu, as well as Senator Melaye, have all pleaded not guilty to the charges when they were arraigned at a Senior Magistrate Court in Lokoja.

The suspects, who declared that the allegations against them were false, had implicated the senator in the allegations of criminal conspiracy, illegal possession of firearms and illegal arms dealing levelled against them by the police.

READ ALSO: Melaye Denied Bail, To Remain In Police Custody

The suspects had claimed to be political thugs of the lawmaker whom they accused of arming them, an allegation that the senator has since denied.

During their arraignment in court today, the suspects and Senator Melaye declared that the allegations against them were false and that they were not guilty when their pleas were taken.

Earlier, the prosecution, led by Dr Alex Izinyon, told the court that the offences were contrary to section 97(1) of the Penalty Code and section 27(1)(a) (1) of the firearms Act CAP P28, laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 2004.

He also reminded the court that the pleas of the defendants were not taken on arraignment, noting that the court has the jurisdiction to try the case and should, therefore, go ahead to take their pleas.

When the charges were read afresh to the defendants, Melaye, Seidu and Salihu, pleaded not guilty as they said the seven charges were all false.

Mr Yemi Mohammed, who held brief for Mr Mike Ozekhome – counsel for Melaye, objected to the application, saying that the case was a criminal one in which witnesses must give their testimonies in the open court.

He stressed that the ‘front-loading’ system which the prosecution was urging the court to adopt amounted to a shortcut that would be prejudicial to his client and reduce the chances of the public getting to know the truth.

In his ruling, the Senior Magistrate, Mr Sulyman Abdullah held that while he would “wholeheartedly” want trials in his court to be concluded speedily, he would have to look at the rules of the court.

He consequently adjourned till July 26 for the commencement of hearing of the case.